The adaptations of FFII and FFIII are far stronger, as the source material was also stronger, if a little on the short side in the case of FFII. That means the adaptation of FFI is a very simple story, though this gives the Warriors of the Light names and personalities that were entirely absent in the source material. This is an accurate reflection of the first three Final Fantasy games, written for a YA audience. Heck, there's even some interesting game tips for those interested in playing the games.more Given that each have is only 50ish pages long, there's no need for Grand Character Development (which mostly didn't exist in these games), and instead there's a good bird's eye view of the adventures in general. The author didn't fall for the temptation of putting more lore where there is none, and instead presented us with a condensed version of the adventures. That said, the novelization of these games is quite good, actually. FF1 is a plain D&D town-and-dungeon campaign, FF2 is a retelling of Star Wars and FF3 is just starting to become something new. However, even I have to admit that the plot of the first few games are. I'm going to be honest: I'm a fan of the FF franchise. The author didn't fall for the temptation of putting more lore where there is none, and instead pre Very good work, given the raw materials! Very good work, given the raw materials! I'm going to be honest: I'm a fan of the FF franchise.

Final fantasy memory of heroes